Close Banner
Free Section  - Quick Takes

04. Medical Cannabis in the Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease

Published on February 1, 2024 Certification expiration date: February 1, 2027

Gregory Pontone, M.D., M.H.S.

Division Chief of Aging, Behavioral, and Cognitive Neurology - University of Florida College of Medicine

Key Points

  • The study suggests that medical cannabis may improve both motor and nonmotor symptoms in Parkinson's disease patients, with 87% of patients reporting improvement in at least 1 symptom.
  • Although about half of the patients experienced adverse events, like somnolence, confusion, or dizziness, none were severe, indicating that medical cannabis is generally well-tolerated in this patient population.
  • More than half of the patients using opioids at baseline either discontinued or reduced their opioid use during medical cannabis treatment, suggesting a possible role for cannabis in reducing reliance on opioids and potentially other medications like benzodiazepines and muscle relaxants.

Free Downloads for Offline Access

  • Free Download Audio File (MP3)

Text version

Hello. I am Dr. Greg Pontone, speaking on behalf of the Psychopharmacology Institute. Today, I shall be discussing an article by Traci Aladeen on the utilization of medical cannabis in the management of Parkinson’s disease. This article explores the potential impact of medical cannabis on symptomatic relief for individuals afflicted with Parkinson’s disease.

The prevalence of Parkinson’s disease is on the rise, and although dopamine-based therapies offer some alleviation for motor symptoms, alternatives are limited, with even fewer options for the treatment of nonmotor symptoms. The authors of the article in question suggest that medical cannabis could enhance both motor and nonmotor symptom management in patients with Parkinson’s disease.

This paper is a retrospective study of patients registered under the New York State Medical Cannabis Program. It is not a randomized controlled trial and does not compare medical cannabis with placebo, nor does it prospectively control for other factors. The study cannot recommend dosages or formulations for medical cannabis due to potential variability in formulations from different dispensaries and variability in how patients self-administer those formulations. However, it systematically investigates the symptomatic changes, adverse events, and concurrent medication changes that may be relevant to the use of medical cannabis in people with Parkinson’s disease.

The study included 69 eligible patients. Fifteen out of these 69 patients discontinued medical cannabis before the study’s conclusion, with lack of efficacy being the most common reason for discontinuation. Only 4 individuals discontinued due to an adverse event. Although 48% of the Parkinson’s patients on medical cannabis experienced at least 1 adverse event, none reported a severe adverse event. Somnolence or fatigue were the most common, followed, in order of decreasing incidence, by confusion or cognitive impairment, dizziness, anxiety, euphoria, vision changes, and a few instances of hallucinations or delusions.

An improvement in at least 1 Parkinson’s associated symptom was reported by 87% of patients after initiating medical cannabis treatment. On the motor side, these included symptoms such as tremor, gait disturbance, rigidity, bradykinesia, dystonia, and dyskinesia. Nonmotor symptoms, such as pain, sleep disturbances, depression, and anxiety, often improved. However, 28% of the sample reported a worsening of at least 1 of these symptoms, with some patients noting a mixed response—some administrations provided relief, whereas others resulted in worsening.

Intriguingly, monitoring changes in concomitant medication revealed that of the patients taking opioids at baseline—which was about 25—over half either discontinued or reduced opioid use during medical cannabis treatment. There was also a trend toward reduction in benzodiazepine and muscle relaxant use, but these did not reach statistical significance.

The most commonly recommended initial formulation of medical cannabis was an oral tincture with a 1-to-1 ratio of THC to CBD, with a maximum daily dose of 14 mg ± 5 mg.

In conclusion, this retrospective chart review evaluated the real-world impact of medical cannabis on Parkinson’s symptoms. Improvement in at least 1 symptom was reported by 87% of patients. Both motor and nonmotor symptoms appeared equally likely to improve. However, at least 1 symptom worsened in 28% of patients. Adverse events, although common (occurring in about half of the sample), were not severe, suggesting that medical cannabis was generally well-tolerated. Consistent with other studies on medical cannabis in Parkinson’s, 56% of opioid users in the study managed to reduce or discontinue their opioid use during medical cannabis treatment—a potential benefit, as opioids can exacerbate issues such as falls, confusion, sedation, and constipation in patients with Parkinson’s. Although the current study’s results are insufficient to establish an evidence-based prescription of medical cannabis, they do offer significant insights into potential risks and benefits to assist in managing patients who may opt for this alternative treatment.

Abstract

Medical Cannabis in the Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease

Traci S Aladeen, Anna G Mattle, Kory Zelen, Moustafa Mesha, Michelle M Rainka, Tanya Geist, Bennett Myers, Laszlo Mechtler

Objectives: Medical cannabis (MC) has recently garnered interest as a potential treatment for neurologic diseases, including Parkinson’s disease (PD). A retrospective chart review was conducted to explore the impact of MC on the symptomatic treatment of patients with PD.

Methods: Patients with PD treated with MC in the normal course of clinical practice were included (n = 69). Data collected from patient charts included MC ratio/formulation changes, PD symptom changes after initiation of MC, and adverse events (AEs) from MC use. Information regarding changes in concomitant medications after MC initiation, including opioids, benzodiazepines, muscle relaxants, and PD medications, was also collected.

Results: Most patients were initially certified for a 1:1 (∆ 9 -tetrahydrocannabinol:cannabidiol) tincture. Eight-seven percent of patients (n = 60) were noted to exhibit an improvement in any PD symptom after starting MC. Symptoms with the highest incidence of improvement included cramping/dystonia, pain, spasticity, lack of appetite, dyskinesia, and tremor. After starting MC, 56% of opioid users (n = 14) were able to decrease or discontinue opioid use with an average daily morphine milligram equivalent change from 31 at baseline to 22 at the last follow-up visit. The MC was well-tolerated with no severe AEs reported and low rate of MC discontinuation due to AEs (n = 4).

Conclusions: The MC may improve motor and nonmotor symptoms in patients with PD and may allow for reduction of concomitant opioid medication use. Large, placebo-controlled, randomized studies of MC use in patients with PD are required.

Free Files
Success!
Check your inbox, we sent you all the materials there.

Reference

Aladeen, T. S., Mattle, A. G., Zelen, K., Mesha, M., Rainka, M. M., Geist, T., Myers, B., & Mechtler, L. (2023).

Medical cannabis in the treatment of Parkinson’s Disease

Clinical Neuropharmacology, 46

(3), 98–104.

Table of Contents

Learning Objectives:

After completing this activity, the learner will be able to:

  1. Evaluate the association between insomnia symptoms and increased stroke risk.
  2. Interpret the findings of a network meta-analysis on the long-term efficacy of antipsychotics, focusing on the efficacy of olanzapine compared with other drugs.
  3. Assess the safety and efficacy of haloperidol for managing delirium in hospitalized patients.
  4. Identify the potential benefits and risks of medical cannabis in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.
  5. Evaluate the need for brain imaging in new psychosis cases, considering factors beyond age and apparent neurologic signs.

Original Release Date: February 1, 2024

Review and Re-release Date: March 1, 2024

Expiration Date: February 1, 2027

Experts: Scott Beach, M.D., Carlos Schenck, M.D., Oliver Freudenreich, M.D., Gregory Pontone, M.D.

Medical Editor: Melissa Mariano, M.D.

Relevant Financial Disclosures: 

Oliver Freudenreich declares the following interests:

- Alkermes:  Research grant, consultant honoraria

- Janssen: Research grant, consultant honoraria

- Otsuka: Research grant

- Karuna: Research grant, consultant honoraria

- Neurocrine: Consultant honoraria

- Vida: Consultant honoraria

- American Psychiatric Association: Consultant honoraria

- Medscape: Honoraria

- Elsevier: Honoraria

- Wolters-Kluwer: Royalties

- UpToDate: Royalties, honoraria

Gregory Pontone declares the following interests:

- Acadia Pharmaceuticals: Consultant

- GE Healthcare: Consultant

All of the relevant financial relationships listed above have been mitigated by Medical Academy and the Psychopharmacology Institute.

None of the other faculty, planners, and reviewers for this educational activity have relevant financial relationships to disclose during the last 24 months with ineligible companies whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling, re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients.

Contact Information: For questions regarding the content or access to this activity, contact us at support@psychopharmacologyinstitute.com

Instructions for Participation and Credit:

Participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted above.

Follow these steps to earn CME credit:

  1. View the required educational content provided on this course page.

  2. Complete the Post Activity Evaluation for providing the necessary feedback for continuing accreditation purposes and for the development of future activities. NOTE: Completing the Post Activity Evaluation after the quiz is required to receive the earned credit.

  3. Download your certificate.

Accreditation Statement

This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the accreditation requirements and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education through the joint providership of Medical Academy LLC and the Psychopharmacology Institute. Medical Academy is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians

Credit Designation Statement

Medical Academy designates this enduring activity for a maximum of 0.5 AMA PRA Category 1 credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Free Files
Success!
Check your inbox, we sent you all the materials there.
Continue in the website
Instant access modal

Become a Silver, Gold, Silver extended or Gold extended Member.

2025–26 Psychopharmacology CME Program

Unlock up to 155 CME Credits, including 40 SA CME Credits.