Close Banner
Section Free  - CAP Smart Takes

03. Electroconvulsive Therapy for Adolescents With Severe Depression and Suicidality

Published on April 1, 2024 Certification expiration date: April 1, 2027

David R. Rosenberg, M.D.

Chair of the Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Neuroscience - Wayne State University School of Medicine

Key Points

  • ECT has proven effective in more than 70% of adolescents suffering from severe depressive episodes and suicidality, with at least 8 sessions recommended for satisfactory response.
  • Factors such as older age and absence of OCD comorbidity may increase ECT's effectiveness, whereas the use of escitalopram might decrease it.

Free Downloads for Offline Access

  • Free Download Audio File (MP3)

Text version

Greetings, this is David Rosenberg. In this Smart Take, we delve into a topic that may stir controversy: The use of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for adolescents grappling with severe depressive episodes and suicidality. However, it is crucial to acknowledge that even today, there are only 2 FDA-approved antidepressants for treating depression in youth: Escitalopram and fluoxetine. This substantiates an urgent requirement for superior treatment options.

Although these medications are FDA approved, and nonmedication therapies, such as cognitive–behavioral therapy and psychotherapy, can be combined with these treatments, many young individuals with depression remain resistant to the currently available treatment options. Partial responses accompanied by continued functional impairment are common. This problem particularly escalates when depression is associated with suicidality or treatment resistance.

ECT, despite our limited understanding of its workings, remains one of the most effective treatments for depression in adults. Therefore, there is a valid rationale behind its application in adolescents.

The study under discussion was a retrospective comparison between responders and nonresponders. It incorporated all adolescent patients with severe depressive episodes and suicidal tendencies admitted to a psychiatric department who underwent ECT treatment. The cohort comprised nearly 500 adolescents demonstrating severe depressive episodes and suicidal behavior.

According to their measures, treatment proved effective in over 70% of patients but ineffective in about 27%. Notably, 8–12 and 12–16 ECT sessions lessened the risk of ineffectiveness compared with fewer than 4 sessions. Thus, at least 8 ECT sessions seem necessary for satisfactory response in adolescents dealing with severe depressive episodes and suicidality.

Furthermore, the risk of ineffectiveness significantly diminished with age; ECT appeared more effective in older vs younger adolescents. Patients demonstrating comorbidity with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) exhibited significantly increased risk of ECT ineffectiveness. Thus, OCD as a comorbidity emerged as a poor prognostic predictor for response to ECT in adolescents with severe depressive episodes.

Interestingly, escitalopram, when compared with sertraline, was linked to an increased risk of ECT ineffectiveness. This finding is surprising, considering that escitalopram is 1 of only 2 FDA-approved antidepressants for adolescent depression. In contrast, sertraline—despite its use in adolescent depression—lacks FDA approval in this population. Conversely, olanzapine and aripiprazole demonstrated a reduced risk of ECT ineffectiveness when compared with quetiapine, which had a higher risk of ECT ineffectiveness.

Although this study is retrospective, which cannot match the reliability of a prospective study, it does not diminish its significance. Retrospective studies can provide valuable leads but often raise more questions than they answer due to key missing points. These limitations make it challenging to draw definitive conclusions from many findings and associations. Nevertheless, this study provides an essential lead and overall suggests that many patients treated with ECT experienced a favorable response.

Potential predictors have emerged, such as comorbidity with OCD predicting poorer response to ECT; age seems to be a determinant, with older age predicting better response and younger age predicting poorer response. Intriguingly, the antidepressant escitalopram—which is FDA approved for major depression in youth—seems less favorably associated with response to ECT than sertraline, an antidepressant used in adolescent major depressive disorder but yet not having FDA approval.

In conclusion, although there are several significant findings from this study, it underscores the need for further research on the utility of ECT in adolescents suffering from major depression. It also highlights the importance of prospective studies that could build on this retrospective investigation.

Abstract

Electroconvulsive Therapy for Adolescents with Severe Depressive Episode and Suicidality: Retrospective Comparison Between Responders and Non-Responders

Hao Ren, Xinglian Wang, Zheng Zhang, Xiufen Zhong, Qinghua Luo, Haitang Qiu, Yan Huang

Background: For adolescents with major depression who exhibit suicidal tendencies, Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) is increasingly adopted in clinical practice. Yet, the precise mechanisms behind its effectiveness remain elusive, and studies on factors that influence treatment outcomes are scarce.

Methods: In this retrospective comparative study, we included all adolescent severe depressive episode patients with suicidal tendencies admitted to the Psychiatry Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University between 2017 and 2021 and received ECT treatment. By collecting data on personal history, medical history, and standard treatment features, we established demographic, disease, medication, and ECT treatment factors variables. Patients were divided into effective and ineffective groups based on the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) scale scores, and differences between outcomes were compared. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors independently associated with ineffectiveness.

Results: A total of 494 adolescent severe depressive episode patients with suicidal behavior who received ECT were included in this study. According to CGI-I scores, the treatment was effective in 361 patients (73.1%) and ineffective in 133 patients (26.9%). Logistic regression analyses showed that 8 to 12 and 12 to 16 ECT sessions reduced the risk of ineffectiveness compared to fewer than 4 sessions. The risk of ineffectiveness decreased with age and increased with comorbidity with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Compared to sertraline, escitalopram was associated with a heightened risk of futility, whereas olanzapine and aripiprazole demonstrated a reduced risk when contrasted with quetiapine.

Conclusions: ECT’s ineffectiveness in treating adolescent severe depressive episode with suicidal behavior decreases with age, and comorbidity with OCD significantly increases the risk of treatment failure. Fewer than 8 ECT sessions may hinder achieving satisfactory results.

Free Files
Success!
Check your inbox, we sent you all the materials there.

Reference

Ren, H., Wang, X., Zhang, Z., Zhong, X., Luo, Q., Qiu, H., & Huang, Y. (2024). Electroconvulsive therapy for adolescents with severe depressive episode and suicidality: Retrospective comparison between responders and non-respondersChild and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 18(1).

Table of Contents

Learning Objectives:

  1. Recognize that at 3-year follow-up, 3 in 4 pediatric patients with OCD were in clinical remission.
  2. Recognize that although not statistically significant, combining probiotics with methylphenidate was associated with higher therapeutic efficacy in patients with ADHD.
  3. Analyze the effectiveness of ECT in treating adolescents with severe depressive episodes and suicidality. 
  4. Recognize that studies to date support the safety of transcranial electrical stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation in children and adolescents.
  5. Recognize that escitalopram was not superior to placebo for relapse prevention in adolescents with MDD. 

Original Release Date: April 1, 2024

Expiration Date: April 1, 2027

Experts: David Rosenberg, M.D.

Medical Editor: Lorena Rodriguez, M.D.

Relevant Financial Disclosures: 

None of the faculty, planners, and reviewers for this educational activity have relevant financial relationships to disclose during the last 24 months with ineligible companies whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling, re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients.

Contact Information: For questions regarding the content or access to this activity, contact us at support@psychopharmacologyinstitute.com

Instructions for Participation and Credit:

Participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted above.

Follow these steps to earn CME credit:

  1. View the required educational content provided on this course page.

  2. Complete the Post Activity Evaluation for providing the necessary feedback for continuing accreditation purposes and for the development of future activities. NOTE: Completing the Post Activity Evaluation after the quiz is required to receive the earned credit.

  3. Download your certificate.

Accreditation Statement

This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the accreditation requirements and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education through the joint providership of Medical Academy LLC and the Psychopharmacology Institute. Medical Academy is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians

Credit Designation Statement

Medical Academy designates this enduring activity for a maximum of 0.5 AMA PRA Category 1 credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Free Files
Success!
Check your inbox, we sent you all the materials there.
Continue in the website
Instant access modal

Become a Silver, Gold, Silver extended or Gold extended Member.

2025–26 Psychopharmacology CME Program

Unlock up to 155 CME Credits, including 40 SA CME Credits.