Text version
Here is a question in a new randomized trial: How many investigators employed by the manufacturer does it take before you would not even bother to look at the results? The answer is, it depends. Suppose the new drug addresses a problem for which we have little to offer at present. Suppose many people at risk might benefit.
Let’s look at a new study of esketamine for treatment-resistant depression in the elderly. Most of the investigators were employed by Janssen, maker of esketamine nasal spray. Thus, investigators were consultants or speakers. That is almost enough for me to stop right there. However, the topic was tantalizing. Is a simple tool available for patients whose remaining years of life could be miserable? We can jump to the results and work backward from there if warranted. Nevertheless, the results pointed out, “Esketamine did not achieve statistical significance for the primary endpoint.” Perhaps
Unlock this Quick Take and earn 0.50 CMEs
Become a Silver, Gold, Silver extended or Gold extended Member.
Already have an account? Sign in
